Oh,,,, it is my mistake cause my limited English...
So I want to say "Cobalt bandwidth management software" is patented,
probably. I aree "general bandwidth management technology" is not
In article <41C05193.2020806 (at mark) sitetronics.com>
by dodell (at mark) sitetronics.com at Dec 16 2004 00:00:35.
> Yutaka Yasuda wrote:
> > Hi Patrick,
> > At first, there is a technical reason why bandwidth management
> > software is not included in current BlueQuartz 5100R release.
> > It is depending on kernel 2.4 series, not for 2.6.
> > Currently, we use FC1, so it is okay but I think it is not
> > so good to continue to use kernel 2.4.
> > I think it is better to port this software as 2.6 ready but we
> > (current BlueQuartz team) have no human resource to do that...
> > And the next, more delicate issue.. (It is difficult to explain
> > in my limited English... Wmmmm...)
> > I guess bandwidth management technology is the patent of Cobalt.
> > I don't know the detail of the patent. I just heard it as a
> > news a few years ago. So the source code itself is opened but
> > the patent issue is not solved completely.
> > And the last question. Turbolinux has their own CVS, see;
> > http://pkgcvs.turbolinux.co.jp/~knaka/cgi-bin/internal/cvsweb.cgi
> > There are a lot of code frangents but you can find base-alpine,
> > base-am... and some modules in it. Please check it.
> > I am not sure they release their software as SRPM style or not.
> > I hope it does make sense for you.
> > Regards,
> > Yasu.
> The technology is not patented and there are several freely available
> bandwidth management platforms for Linux. Whether or not the license of
> the code allows redistribution, I don't know. If the code was released
> under the BSD license with the rest of what is in the BQ project, there
> are no issues with this.
> I am not sure what needs to be done to port this functionality to a 2.6
> kernel, but I do think that it may end up being simpler to make a new
> frontend for an existing bandwidth management tool.