Index: [Article Count Order] [Thread]

Date:  Tue, 14 Dec 2004 20:25:20 -0000
From:  "Leigh Blackwell" <leigh (at mark) codacommerce.com>
Subject:  [coba-e:01684] Re: Stable?
To:  <coba-e (at mark) bluequartz.org>
Message-Id:  <20041214202521.636FEFF13 (at mark) smtp.bulldogdsl.com>
In-Reply-To:  <41BF0F36.7070405 (at mark) redirect.pt>
X-Mail-Count: 01684

Hi Raul,

The ssl port fix is detailed here...
http://bluequartz.org/ml/archive/coba-e/1200/1226.html

have you tried using perl/cgi scripts on over ssl on your install?

Regards

Leigh 

-----Original Message-----
From: Raul Carvalho [mailto:raulcarvalho (at mark) redirect.pt] 
Sent: 14 December 2004 16:05
To: coba-e (at mark) bluequartz.org
Subject: [coba-e:01679] Re: Stable?

Hello Leigh,

I have to say that I had Zero problems with my fresh install of BQ + FC1 
Reference Kit.
I only ran into troubles when I had to install some other stuff like 
MySQL, but I managed to do all the upgrades necessary and the box now is 
running smoothly.
Enough of my experience :)
I would like you to please detail on your "Ssl_perl reference to port 
removed" since I am interested in having more than one SSL site per box!

Thank you for your input,
Raul

>Hi All,
>
>It's got to the point that my cobalt lx50 based on FC1 and BQ is up and
>running without any issues and I have started to use it for hosting
>customer's sites. I see strings on here with ppl having issues with fresh
>installations; fortunately I didn't really have any of these as I stuck to
>the reference kit (not saying that other didn't :) 
>
>I have done some work to try and make this machine a suitable replacement
>for my leased xtr. Unfortunately I haven't taken notes on all the issues
>that I have come across but I thought it would be good idea to cover a
>couple of points, and see if I indeed have a stable machine in the eyes of
>others on the list.
>
>Split_log.patch
>Logrotate fixed
>Ssl_perl reference to port removed (restricted you to a single ssl site per
>box)
>
>Removed cgi-bin directory and replaced it with /  in httpd.conf 
>	Allowing cgi's to be executed in anywhere in the site (like the
>raq), 	I havent clarified if the site settings for CGI is working
>correctly.
>
>Ssl cgi (very bad hack) Added.. to the vhost file of site"**" to enable cgi
>on ssl
>	AddHandler cgi-script .cgi
>	<Directory "/home/.sites/48/site**/web/">
>    	AllowOverride None
>    	Order allow,deny
>    	Allow from all
>    	Options +ExecCGI
>    	SSLOptions +StdEnvVars
>	</Directory>
>
>Changed httpd.conf
>DirectoryIndex index.cgi index.pl index.wml index.html index.htm
>
>In addition to the above fixes and mods, I have installed a couple of extra
>things.. 
>
>Mysql 4.1.7
>Php-mysql on admserv
>Modified version of perl DBD-mysql 2.1028 (to over come connection timeout
>issues with php and permit a v4 mysql)
>Mailscanner
>Mailwatch (v. good tool when integrated in gui)
>http://mailwatch.sourceforge.net/index.html
>ClamAV
>Webalizer
>Pkg, openwebmail
>Pkg, dev-tools
>
>
>I think my main worry is with apache and the small differences between v1*
>and v2 which I believe are causing the ssl and cgi issues. 
>
>I have seen talk of db versions 3 and 4 in relation to passwords etc, but
>this is out of my depth and I am uncertain to whether this affects me, if
>someone could advise???
>
>I haven't used any of the ruby project as I assumed that was for redhat9
>installs.
>
>I really hope I have covered all the main fixes/mods (I'm not importing any
>sites so I have left those issues out). Has anyone any suggestions on ones
>that I should have in place? 
>
>Hopefully we can see if we can get a definitive list for the next release.
>
>Cheers
>
>LEigh
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>